Distance education has been a method for delivering
instruction for well over a century (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek,
2012). Distance education has played a vital role in providing learning
opportunities for individuals who might not otherwise be able to access
learning due to geographic location, time, or other personal constraints
(Simonson, et al., 2012). The needs or demands of individuals wishing to access
learning via distance education as well as advances in technology have expanded
the availability of distance learning opportunities (Simonson, et al., 2012).
As distance learning opportunities continue to grow and expand so too will the
perceptions of distance education.
The quality of distance learning is often called into
question as concerns and perceptions arise over distance education programs
being diploma mills that lack quality instruction and are not accredited
(Simonson, et al., 2012). This perception however continues to be dispelled as
individuals become more aware of the fact that distance education programs have
the potential of being equivalent in quality as a program that takes place in a
traditional face-to-face classroom (Simonson, et al., 2012). This increased
awareness is as a result of some institutions being conscientious of
highlighting important components of their distance programs such as being
accredited, having academic rigor, and having highly qualified instructional
staff (Gambescia & Paolucci, 2009).
According to the Sloan Consortium (2013), in 2011 there were
6.7 million students enrolled in at least one online course. Additionally, academic
leaders’ perceptions of learning outcomes in online education were surveyed and
found that increasingly these leaders view online education as being comparable
(Sloan Consortium, 2013). In the last decade there has been a shift in
perceptions in viewing distance education more favorably. Unfavorable perceptions of distance learning
continue to be positively impacted by continued advances in technology.
Technological innovations have resulted in individuals being able to
communicate with others regardless of location or sometimes time which is also
the essence of distance learning where in learning “occurs at different times
and in different places” (Simonson, et al., p.10). Advances in and greater use
of technology tools to facilitate communication has allowed individuals to gain
more experience and comfort with communication mediated through technology
(Laureate, n.d.). As a result these advances have helped individuals see the
value and benefits of communicating at a distance which has helped increase the
acceptance of distance education (Laureate, n.d.).
It is clear that distance education has grown in the last
decade and will continue to grow in the next decade as well. Perceptions will
continue to shift as distance education expands and is more easily accessed
with technological innovations. While there appears to still be a great deal of
emphasis placed on the convenience and flexibility aspect of distance learning
there is a call for change in placing a greater emphasis on highlighting the
academic quality and reputation on the online program and institution
(Gambescia & Paolucci, 2009). Placing greater emphasis on quality of
academic programs will continue to promote positive perceptions of distance
education for prospective students, potential employers, and society as a whole.
With greater acceptance and appreciation for the value of distance education it
will have the potential over the course of the next twenty years for expanding
existing distance learning opportunities and creating new ones as the need
arises. Individuals will continue to demand high quality educational
opportunities that are available in distance learning formats making learning
more accessible. It will be more important than ever to ensure that as demand
increases and more distance learning experiences are offered in the coming
decades that the instruction is designed to create an efficient and meaningful
learning experience.
Creating efficient and effective learning experiences as an instructional
designer is one of the most important ways for me to further promote positive
perceptions of distance learning. When designing distance learning experiences
I will need to ensure that I am cognizant of the needs of the learners
participating in the distance learning experience as well as any content and
context factors that may influence how the instruction is designed. Being aware
of the needs of the learners, the content, and the context will help me
identify the most effective methods and activities for enhancing learning
(Simonson, et al., 2012). I can also promote positive perceptions of distance
learning by utilizing various technology tools that enhance communication in
distance learning such as blogs, wikis, discussion forums, or social networking
(Simonson, et al., 2012). Incorporating technology tools that individuals are
already comfortable using as well as other advancing communication technologies
will improve the potential for greater acceptance of distance learning
(Gambescia & Paolucci, 2009). I will also need to ensure that any distance
learning experiences I develop are designed in a way that is easy to navigate
for the learner and that offers support systems equivalent to what they would
receive from a traditional, face-to-face classroom (Simonson, et al., 2012).
As a distance learner myself I will also be able to use my
own personal experiences to promote positive perceptions of distance learning.
I will be able to provide others with insights on my experiences with distance
learning along with the knowledge and skills I have developed throughout this
course. I will be able to communicate more effectively going forward on the
positive aspects of distance education outside of focusing on flexibility and
convenience and instead highlight the quality of content and quality of
interactions with instructors and fellow learners which has created a
successful learning experience for me.
References
Gambescia,
S., & Paolucci, R. (2009). Academic fidelity and integrity as attributes of
university online degree program offerings. Online Journal of Distance
Learning Administration, 12(1).
Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring121/gambescia121.html
Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring121/gambescia121.html
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (n.d.). The future of distance education. [Video webcast]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_3467850_1%26url%3D
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.
Sloan Consortium (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the united states. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/changing_course_2012
No comments:
Post a Comment